Home > MPLS 642-611 > Share your MPLS Experience

Share your MPLS Experience

Please share with us your experience after taking the MPLS 642-611 exam, your materials, the way you learned, your recommendations…

Your posts are warmly welcome!

Please don’t ask for links to download copyright materials here…

Categories: MPLS 642-611 Tags:
  1. Cienfuegos
    July 11th, 2012 at 14:51 | #1

    Gracias MrCisco! el 17 rindo, esperemos no encontrar nada raro.

    Lo feo es que ahora para CCIP hay que dar QoS, pero despues desaparece la carrera…

  2. Zeus09
    July 12th, 2012 at 10:21 | #2

    Hi All,

    I am new to this site, can someone please tell me if P4S 2.29 is still valid ?

    Thanks
    Zeus09

  3. Amine
    July 13th, 2012 at 10:07 | #3

    Hi everybody

    Thanks god I cleared today the MPLS exam with a score of 1000/1000. P4S 2.29 still valid. There is about 8 TE questions which are not scored.

    The 2 labs are the same as mentioned previously.

    Good luck for all.

  4. SilverSurf
    July 18th, 2012 at 10:06 | #4

    Does anyone have any new update on the exam? Am going for the exam on 23rd July.

  5. SilverSurf
    July 23rd, 2012 at 03:58 | #5

    Hi all,

    Cleared 642-611 today with 987. Thanks iptut.

  6. Joker
    July 23rd, 2012 at 06:16 | #6

    Hi all,
    Just cleared too, thanks iptut

  7. hans
    July 23rd, 2012 at 15:34 | #7

    Hi i’ll take the exam 2morrow and have one question : is there any MPLS Traffic Engineering in this Exam ??

  8. Anonymous
    July 25th, 2012 at 09:24 | #8

    ip cef
    ip vrf customer_Certkiller
    rd 115:300
    route-target both 115:300
    access-list 10 permit 192.168/3.0.0.0.0.255
    route-map CertkillerMAP permit 10
    match ip address 10
    set extcommunity rt 115:301

    A. The route-map is missing the route-map Certkiller MAP permit 20 statement.
    B. The vrf configuration is missing the export map RTMAP command.
    C. The vrf configuration is missing the route-target export 115:301 command.
    D. The rd 115:300 command is not correct.
    E. The set extcommunity rt 115:301 command is not correct.
    F. The route-target both 115:300 command is not correct.

    Answer: A, B (or) B,E

    Frends., Please let me know on this answer.

  9. Anonymous
    July 25th, 2012 at 09:25 | #9

    sory, the question is this way

    Study the configuration shown in the exhibit. Router Certkiller 1 is supposed to
    selectively attach an additional RT of 115:301 to all export routes matched by
    access-list 10. The configuration is currently not working as intended.
    Which two items are wrong in the configuration? Select two.

  10. Anonymous
    July 25th, 2012 at 09:26 | #10

    ip cef
    ip vrf customer_Certkiller
    rd 115:300
    route-target both 115:300
    access-list 10 permit 192.168/3.0.0.0.0.255
    route-map CertkillerMAP permit 10
    match ip address 10
    set extcommunity rt 115:301

    Study the configuration shown in the exhibit. Router Certkiller 1 is supposed to
    selectively attach an additional RT of 115:301 to all export routes matched by
    access-list 10. The configuration is currently not working as intended.
    Which two items are wrong in the configuration? Select two.

    A. The route-map is missing the route-map Certkiller MAP permit 20 statement.
    B. The vrf configuration is missing the export map RTMAP command.
    C. The vrf configuration is missing the route-target export 115:301 command.
    D. The rd 115:300 command is not correct.
    E. The set extcommunity rt 115:301 command is not correct.
    F. The route-target both 115:300 command is not correct.

    Answer: A, B (or) B,E

    Frends., Please let me know on this answer.

  11. Anonymous
    July 25th, 2012 at 17:15 | #11

    B & E

  12. Anonymous
    July 26th, 2012 at 05:48 | #12

    thanks !! for that answer confirmation ( B and E)

  13. CCNP-SP
    July 26th, 2012 at 10:26 | #13

    Where / When is the CCNP-SP site coming (with dumps?)

  14. Aidyl
    August 1st, 2012 at 00:43 | #14

    Hi All and IPTUT.

    Is this still applicable to the new CCNP-SP certification?
    same goes with MPLS 642-611 Exam, BGP 642-661 Exam and QoS 642-642 Exam??

  15. Corin
    August 29th, 2012 at 20:13 | #15

    The VPN client was full IPSec, so wokerd with the MS VPN and Cisco client. We even used to have our own client that was the router software wrapped in a kernel driver. Quite clever dude that did that.I always liked the old AT config verse the Cisco modal method, but the newer AlliedWare software went the Cisco path, to increase admin simplicity.The big markets for AT gear was Europe and Asia/Pacific. US was too into Cisco etc. Espically in post 2001, when the market was flooded with cheap second hand gear. Bad times for AT.

  16. Cuchulais
    August 29th, 2012 at 20:24 | #16

    Thanks. I’m going to have to follow this more collesy. Networks are extremely complex (thus expensive) as they made of autonomous routers and switches that attempt to create a single system via these long in the tooth routing protocols. If OpenFlow is successful of creating a single intelligent system that’s controlled by a set of controllers Google is right that this will revolutionize networking. In theory this will continue the put to commodity of network devices making them basically dumb devices with ports connected to a virtualized controller. Almost makes me want to dust off my networking books 🙂

  17. Nawal
    August 30th, 2012 at 02:24 | #17

    In 2001, I got my first PC, (Well, 2000), so it was a few years before I even knew what TCP\IP and rotreus were, let alone AT stuff. Heck, I can hardly do anything with it now; I damned near crapped myself when I attempted to reverse telnet into a cisco cell card and found out I could issue commands on it.

  18. Francisco
    September 1st, 2012 at 05:40 | #18

    If your wanting more that 16 peers in BGP (e or i or cfnoederations), you could also use an Allied Telesyn router, as I don’t remember putting a limit in (in the pre-AlliedWare software). The AR7xx with a 1GB of ram worked really well.

  19. Naveed
    September 2nd, 2012 at 07:42 | #19

    @Hamza

    Write in english bro so eveybody can understand and share the knowledge…

  20. salmaan
    September 11th, 2012 at 14:38 | #20

    Can any one give me link to download mpls videos ?

  21. LJ
    December 31st, 2012 at 15:50 | #21

    Any news for the new CCIP ?
    I would like to have a feedback about the new exam:
    642-780 MSPVM Maintaining Cisco Service Provider VPNs and MPLS Networks (MSPVM)

    Thx

  22. melba
    January 3rd, 2013 at 09:47 | #22

    Learning Cisco Exams is now easy
    Prepared For Cisco Exams, Cert kingdom is for best for preparing the Cisco exam, I am thankful to Cert kingdom that made it possible for me in achieving my goal.
    best part all exams are included in on pack. which saves my lost of money

  23. Anonymous
    February 9th, 2014 at 10:01 | #23

    download free latest dumps from
    9tut .webs .com

  24. sami
    April 12th, 2014 at 11:03 | #24

    hi all
    subscribe to that channel http://www.youtube.com/user/Joynetworks for free
    that trainer is excellent , he makes the technology easy to understad.

  25. pankete01
    March 2nd, 2015 at 07:50 | #25

    hi Guys

    please send me more infor about this course CCNA SERICE PROVIDER

    i have already Done my CCNA Routung & Switching

  26. MPLS_man
    March 12th, 2015 at 19:34 | #26

    Check different gıides and blogs to stuy for MPLS and all other CCNP lessons.
    You can chech this one..enjoy..
    http://ipcisco.com/mpls-protection-and-restoration-part-1/

  27. Anonymous
  28. Anonymous
    April 10th, 2015 at 12:02 | #28

    Please send VCE exam simulator 1.3.2 crack. mail
    LsnveL@gmail.com

  29. CCNA SP
    December 4th, 2015 at 11:47 | #29

    Hi Guys,

    Do you know where i can find the forum for the CCNA SP or any information related to the exams please?

Comment pages
1 2 272